Kathryn Walls is a contributor to American Notes and Queries (ANQ), a quarterly
journal containing short articles, notes and reviews covering British and
American literature. Her article “The
Axe in “Sir
Gawain and the Green Knight”” published in ANQ, analyzes the significance of
the axe and suggests what the axe might symbolize.
Walls stated the axe “…goes
on to govern the action of the poem as a whole” (13). Her article also analyzed how the axe symbolically
alluded to biblical scripture. Walls stresses that other objects, like the
girdle and the pentangle, are actively acknowledged by the poem’s author and
points out that “the axe remains uninterpreted within the poem” (13). Walls’s analysis stresses that the axe is eye
catching, vital to the plot and an iconic symbol.
Advocating the axe’s significance, Walls states that the Green Knight
could have used “...a scythe (the normal attribute of Death), a king's sword,
or a priest's knife…”, but instead used an axe (14). The green knight offers it as a “gift” and it
is literally hung up over Gawain’s head after it is used to behead the Green
Knight, “but--metaphorically speaking--it hangs over Gawain throughout
the poem” (Walls 13). Walls also points
out that The Green Knight is leaning on the axe as he explains the intricate
details of the “game” Gawain had just played.
Walls referred to Joseph Longo, a critic, who suggested that
the “axe alludes to the words of John the Baptist in Matthew 3.10”
(14). Walls agrees with Longo’s
suggestion that
“the axe would indeed have been recognizable to
medieval readers as an allusion to Matthew 3.10” but argues “…Longo does not do justice to the question of its relevance to the poem
as a whole” (14). Walls succeeded where
Longo failed, she stressed the parallels between John the Baptist’s warning in
the scripture (which referred to an axe downing a tree or an axe leaning on or
hanging from a tree) to the Green Knight’s first appearance
in the poem (carrying an axe in one hand and a branch in the other) (14).
Walls provided adequate
evidence that the axe governed the poem.
She also provided an interesting perspective pointing out how the poem
may refer to a biblical scripture. Although an interesting point, I disagree
with her evidence that supports a biblical parallel between the poem and
scripture. Walls’s argument relied on “Augustine's
commentary on Matthew”, which is only an interpretation of the biblical text (15). It appears Walls is desperately searching
for any biblical parallels she can find, which ultimately deterred my interest
in the article.
Works Cited
Walls,
Kathryn. "The Axe In "Sir Gawain And The Green Knight.." Anq
16.1 (2003): 13-18.
Academic Search Premier. Web. 17 Sept. 2012.
It would have been interesting if you had actually researched the biblical passage to fully support your argument that Walls may have been relying on only one interpretation of the passage rather than her own.
ReplyDelete